Skip to main content

Torbay Care Trust Fined For Data Protection Breaches


As a result of breaching data protection laws, the Torbay Care Trust has been fined £175,000 by the ICO. A spreadsheet containing "sensitive" information about the employees' religion and sexuality; as well as names, dates of birth and national insurance numbers was published on to their website. The ICO said that such information was likely to cause substantial damage and/or distress to those who had had their details exposed. What is more, head of enforcement with the ICO, Stephen Eckersley, highlighted that the release of such information put staff at risk of being victims of identity fraud. The breach only came to light when a member of the public reported it 19 weeks after it was posted, the ICO said.

The Data Protection Act (DPA) requires organisations to exercise the appropriate organisational measures to eliminate the risk of such sensitive information being used without authorisation. This includes the need to have "effective policies and procedures in place to control its use and further dissemination". Organisations may publish equality and diversity information about staff in an aggregated form, but the publication of their personal information in such a way is strictly prohibited.

Head of the Trust at the time of the incident, Anthony Farnsworth, attributed the breach of the DPA to a lack of organisation due to minimal checks within its processes. The data protection watchdog carried out an investigation and concluded that the Trust did not provide guidance for staff as to what information can be published online. They also were found to not have adequate check in place to identify potential problems. 

The watchdog acknowledged the steps the Trust has taken since the incident in order to avoid such a breach in the future. Farnsworth explained that they have now implemented more robust procedures for managing staff information to overcome such risks. Although disappointed by the large fine, the organisation accepts the conclusion the ICO came to. Provisions have been made so the fine can be paid without need to cut budgets for staff or health and social care. 


Brian can be contacted at Stone King, Solicitors.  For further news and information on legal topics of interest, please visit Brian's other blogs:



Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Cloud Service Providers Now Subject To Scrutiny Of Assurance Registry

After mounting concerns relating to the security of cloud computing, a new online platform is to enable users to assess the security features of registered cloud providers. The Security, Trust & Assurance Registry (STAR) hopes to encourage providers to improve their data protection security thanks to this increased transparency, as well as aid organisations using the providers to comply with data protection laws. The Working Party drew attention to firm’s lack of control over customer’s personal data when using cloud services. As cloud computing uses an internet based network in place of local computing resources, they stated that there is risk of "loss of governance, insecure or incomplete data deletion, insufficient audit trails or isolation failures," by organisations using these providers.          Operated by not-for-profit body the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), STAR hopes to limit such risks to data protection. The CSA’s members in...
Post a Comment
Read more

Jail Sentences for Data Protection Offenders

The House of Commons' Home Affairs Select Committee are encouraging the Home Secretary to introduce jail sentences as a possible punishment for data protection offenders. This is to act as a stronger deterrent than the current, quite ineffective fines.  It is generally unlawful for a person to "knowingly or recklessly without the consent of the data controller obtain or disclose personal data or the information contained in personal data, or procure the disclosure to another person of the information contained in personal data", under Section 55 of the Data Protection Act (DPA). But now, personal data has never been easier to access and the risks of information being leaked are an increasing concern. There are many new suppliers of information who are unlikely to understand or take notice of the rules to which they must comply. While the maximum fine for committing a section 55 offence is £5,000 when the case is heard in a Magistrates Court, and unlimited when ...
Post a Comment
Read more

LAW FIRMS AT RISK OF CYBER ATTACK WARNS BIS by Brian Miller Solicitor

The Head of Cyber Security at the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) has warned that security breaches have reached an all time high, with 93% of larger businesses suffering a security breach within the last year and 87% of smaller businesses being similarly affected, a jump of 76% since 2012.  Often the breach is not always from the outside: many of these breaches are staff related. Costs to remedy these breaches can range from a few thousand pounds to hundreds of thousands when the breach affects the reputation of the business, for instance, if it is publicised. A survey carried out by BIS showed that the cost to smaller businesses was on average between £35,000-£65,000, whilst that for large businesses ranged from £450,000-£850,000. One company in London last year was estimated to have lost £800m in revenue from a cyber attack. Law firms are no exception when it comes to cyber attacks.  In many ways, they are a greater target, as they store la...
Post a Comment
Read more