Skip to main content

ICO imposes fine of £250,000 for data protection breach by Scottish council



A Scottish council hired a man known as ‘GS’ to “digitise” its employees’ pension records with no written contract in place between the Scottish council and GS containing the data processing and security requirements specified by the Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO).  

Files containing Council employees’ names, addresses, national insurance numbers and, in some cases, individual’s salary and bank account details, had been dumped in a supermarket’s recycling bank and found by a member of the public.  

In its civil monetary penalty notice, the ICO said that approximately 8,000 pension records, some of which included details of ill health benefits, had been digitised by GS.  GS would send to the council by standard post unencrypted discs containing the information.  It said that the council was unaware that GS was disposing of the paper records in recycling banks.  

The ICO said in its civil monetary notice “The Commissioner is satisfied that the contravention was of a kind likely to cause substantial damage or substantial distress to data subjects whose confidential personal data (including financial information) was seen by a member of the public who had no right to see that information.”

The Data Protection Act (“DPA”) sets out a number of requirements that data controllers must adhere to, including selecting processors that can provide sufficient guarantees that they can properly meet the technical and organisational measures requirement and take reasonable steps to ensure compliance, and having in place a written contract with data processors, specifying that the processor may only undertake processing activities that the controller tasks them with and that the processors meet the technical and organisational measures requirement of the DPA.  

Under the DPA, the data controller is responsible for personal data security standards being met by the processors.  When outsourcing, data controllers should therefore  take the appropriate measures to ensure compliance, including choosing reputable data processors and having a written contract in place which deals with the necessary data protection requirements. 

If you are in any doubt about the detailed terms of a data processing agreement, we can help.



Brian can be contacted at Stone King, Solicitors.  For further news and information on legal topics of interest, please visit Brian's other blogs:


Brian Miller Solicitor's Computer Games Law Blog

Brian Miller Solicitor's IT Law Blog

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Cloud Service Providers Now Subject To Scrutiny Of Assurance Registry

After mounting concerns relating to the security of cloud computing, a new online platform is to enable users to assess the security features of registered cloud providers. The Security, Trust & Assurance Registry (STAR) hopes to encourage providers to improve their data protection security thanks to this increased transparency, as well as aid organisations using the providers to comply with data protection laws. The Working Party drew attention to firm’s lack of control over customer’s personal data when using cloud services. As cloud computing uses an internet based network in place of local computing resources, they stated that there is risk of "loss of governance, insecure or incomplete data deletion, insufficient audit trails or isolation failures," by organisations using these providers.          Operated by not-for-profit body the Cloud Security Alliance (CSA), STAR hopes to limit such risks to data protection. The CSA’s members include Google, Microsoft and m

Thirteen Point Guide to the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR)

The General Data Protection Regulation (“ GDPR ”) will come into force and apply to all EU member states from 25 May 2018. The UK’s decision to leave the EU will not affect the commencement of the GDPR. It contains eighty-eight pages, 99 articles and 173 related recitals and is therefore no small piece of legislation. Overall, the principles under the GDPR are similar to those under the current Data Protection Act. However, there are new elements and significant enhancements; particularly in relation to accountability. The GDPR puts the onus on organisations to show how it complies with the data protection principles and there is a greater emphasis on documenting specific activities. Other  key changes  to be aware of include: Wider scope of application  – certain definitions under the GDPR have been broadened, for example, the definition of “personal data”. Higher penalties  – the GDPR introduces tougher sanctions, including administrative fines for non-com